Appeal court judges will today to restart hearings in the Geert Wilders ‘fewer Moroccans’ case, after rejecting claims of political interference.

Wilders had tried to get the court to question former justice minister Ivo Opstelten, in the wake of reports by that there was contact between Opstelten and the head of the public prosecution department about the case in 2014.

They also say Opstelten was keen to see Wilders prosecuted for leading the anti-Moroccan chant at a pre-election meeting.

However, the appeal court judges have rejected Wilders call for further delays, and the case will continue on Wednesday with an outline of the facts.

The original appeal began in May last year but Wilders’ legal team successfully applied for the judges to be removed after alleging bias. The court had refused to delay the trial so that more research could be carried out into the decision not to prosecute D66 leader Alexander Pechtold for comments he made about Russians.

2014

The ‘fewer Moroccans’ case dates back to 2014 when Wilders asked a roomful of supporters if they wanted to have ‘more or fewer’ Moroccans in the country. When the crowd shouted back: ‘Fewer, fewer,’ Wilders responded: ‘We’ll take care of that.’

In December 2016, Wilders was found guilty of inciting discrimination against Dutch Moroccans. A panel of three judges said Wilders’s comments were ‘demeaning and insulting to the Moroccan population’.

However, the court decided not to fine or sentence Wilders on the basis that a criminal conviction was sufficient punishment in itself.